|
2005 NPS Management Program Supplement
2000 NPS Management Program
NPS Home Page
Many documents on this
site are PDF files, which require the use of the free Adobe
Acrobat Reader.

|
Colorado
Nonpoint Source Management Program
2005
Supplement
The Water
Quality Control Commission approved the 2005 NPS Management Program
supplement on August 8, 2005. This document supplements the major
update of the program approved by the Environmental Protection Agency in
January, 2000. Much
of the background and program foundation found in the 2000 document is
still valid. However, the 2005 supplement supersedes the 2000 action
plan, program priorities, and funding guidelines. In addition, some of the
best management practices also have been updated. The
supplement outlines the program actions for the next five years. In
particular the NPS program will migrate from an individual pollutant
category approach, such as agriculture, mining or construction, to a
pollutant-integrated watershed approach, addressing the collective NPS
needs of a specific geographic region of Colorado. Several
new provisions are described in the supplement, especially related to
funding.
-
A
watershed plan is the cornerstone for all on-the-ground restoration
and remediation efforts. Those efforts must be prioritized in a
watershed plan before they can be approved for funding.
-
NPS
grant funds may no longer be used to remediate sources of pollutants
that may eventually require a discharge permit.
-
Monitoring
and assessment activities: NPS grant funds may be used only to
(a) collect data in direct support of the development and
implementation of a total maximum daily load (TMDL) allocation; (b)
determine measurable results from on-the-ground NPS projects; or (c)
develop watershed plans, when identified as a priority in the annual
proposal guidance.
-
Use of
NPS grant funds on private lands: Landowners/operators will be
expected to participate financially in implementing best management
practices on their land. Their contribution can be either by
direct cost contribution, i.e., cash, or through in-kind services,
e.g., labor. In some instances, in particular where the
long-term maintenance is necessary to prevent re-release of pollutants
into the environment, an environmental covenant may be requested.
|