Colorado Radionuclide Abatement and Disposal Strategy
(CO-RADS)
The purpose of this page is to provide an accessible electronic
library of all guidance and reference documents developed
through the CO-RADS project. As new material and information
becomes available, this page will be updated to provide the most
current information on compliance options and other technical
issues associated with radionuclides in drinking water.
There are a number of options available to resolve radionuclide
violations, however there are many considerations associated
with each of these options. Ultimately, identifying a
viable option for a system can be an extreme challenge.
The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency has a number of
documents available online that will offer general guidance on
various compliance options.
Colorado specific guidance on many issues of concern can be
found below.
The Phase 3 summary report developed by Malcolm Pirnie, Inc.
shows that traditional treatment and disposal methods for
radionuclide compliance can be extremely costly. Readers
should be aware that there were limitations in certain areas of
these evaluations, such as
non-treatment options like blending or consolidation, or
certain waste handling options such as discharges to wastewater
treatment facilities – for additional information on these
impacts,
please see the presentation materials for the first
Phase 4 regional meeting.
Phase 3 Treatment and Disposal Evaluation Summary Report
In light of the high costs for traditional approaches identified in
Phase 3, the Water Quality Control Division will continue to work with
systems and waste handling agencies in Phase 4 to develop more cost
effective alternatives.
Waste streams generated by radionuclide removal processes may fall
under the regulatory jurisdiction of multiple program areas within the
department, including the Solid Waste, Radiation Management, and
Wastewater Permitting Programs. EPA and local health departments
may also have jurisdiction over certain waste handling practices.
On average, 60 percent of the capital costs estimated in Phase 3 were
associated with waste handling basins. For some systems, these
basins made up more than 80 percent of estimated capital costs.
Alternative disposal options or basin design could provide significant
savings. However, it is challenging to identify and address all
associated waste handling requirements. The following documents
should provide further guidance on this issue.
Back
to the top || Safe Drinking Water Home Page ||
WQCD Home Page |
Frequently Asked Questions
Compliance Options Guidance
CO-RADS Phase 3 Treatment and Disposal Evaluations
Additional Guidance for Treatment, Disposal, and Alternative
Compliance Approaches
Waste Management and Disposal
Phase 4
Regional Meeting Presentation Materials
Outreach and Communication Resources for
Water Systems
Enforcement |