|
Cotter Area Maps: Cotter Documents:
|
Hazardous Materials and Waste Management Division
|
| December 26 | Letter from Cotter: RE: December 17, 2003 Department Correspondence Pertaining to the Review of Cotter Corporation's Request for Authorization of Maywood Soils, Allotment 1 |
| December 22 |
Letter from Cotter: RE: Pilot Process Test for Physical Processing of Hardened Yellowcake: RML 369-01 License Condition 16.1 Notification
|
| December 22 | Letter to Michael Stiel: Response to Questions on the RAP |
| December 19 | Press Release: Maywood Proposal to be Considered as Part of Cotter License Renewal (no longer available in electronic format) |
| December 17 | Letter to Cotter: Request for Authorization of Maywood Soils Allotment 1 for Receipt at the Cotter Corporation Canon City Mill |
| December 11 |
Letter to Sharyn Cunningham: Connection of the 1614 Grand Residence to the Canon City water supply. Cotter License Renewal Hearing Transcript for 12/11/2003 |
| December 10 |
Letter
from Cotter:
RE: November
19, 2003 Department Correspondence Pertaining to the Departments
Review of Cotter
Corporation’s September 15, 2003 License Renewal Application and Accompanying Support
Documents
Letter to UAACOG: Draft Upper Arkansas Regional 203 Water Quality Plan |
| November 19 |
Letter to Cotter: Adequacy of Cotter License Renewal Application dated September 15, 2003 First licensing hearing (transcript) |
| November 5 | Parking lot questions and answers |
| October 15 | Completeness review for Cotter Corporation Canon City Milling Facility Radioactive Materials License Application dated September 15, 2003 |
| August 28 |
Transmittal letter for Amendment 41 to Cotter's Canon City radioactive material license |
| July 25 |
Letter to Cotter: Regarding Amended Order |
| July 24 |
Results of
Sampling for Plutonium, Uranium, Lead and Molybdenum in the Canon City
Vicinity |
| June 17 |
Maywood Soils EA Supplemental Findings Re: Socioeconomic Aspects and Impacts Maywood Soils EA Supplemental Findings Re: Transportation Aspects and Impacts |
| June 13 |
Letter to Cotter: Request for Cotter comment on RPI socioeconomic analysis report. |
| June 10 | Lincoln Park Citizens' Update |
| May 20 |
Letter to Colorado Citizens Against Toxic Waste: |
| March 17 |
Letter to Cotter: Notice of Inconsistency in Maximum Authorized Quantities |
| February 19 |
Radiation Management Program transmittal letter for License Amendment 40 Incorporating the letter as a requirement of the license; from Dave Butcher, Laboratory and Radiation Services Division Director; to Jim Cain, Radiation Safety Officer, Cotter Corporation License Amendment 40 Spells out materials, maximum amounts for this license, references, and other details for operation of the mill |
| February 18 |
Letter from Cotter: RE: administrative controls for accepting shipments of CERCLA site materials; meeting between Cotter, EPA, and CDPHE. |
| February 4 |
Letter from Cotter: RE: the Transportation and Demographic and Socioeconomic addenda to the Environmental Assessment (EA); response to RS letter of October 14, 2002. Addendum regarding Transportation, Receipt, and Use of Maywood Soils at the Cañon City Milling Facility, update to the EA; response to RM letter of October 14, 2002 Addendum regarding Demographic and Socioeconomic impacts due to Cotter Corporation Receipt of Maywood Material at the Cañon City Milling Facility, update to the EA; response to RM letter of October 14, 2002. |
| January 29 |
Letter to Ken E. Brockman, Director, Division of Nuclear Materials Safety, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Region IV Response to NRC letter of December 6, 2002 listing six concerns regarding radioactive materials received at the Cañon City Milling Facility of Cotter Corporation, a State of Colorado licensee, from Sequoyah Fuels Corporation, an NRC licensee. Attachments will be added at a future date. |
| January 6 |
Letter to Cotter: Operations at mill now significantly address items of concern; suspension released. These regulatory actions by the Department are independent of the EPA findings regarding the suitability of the site to receive materials from other Superfund sites under the “Offsite Rule.” |
| January 3 |
Letter from EPA to Cotter: Details the unacceptability of five Proposed Units, and a 60-Day Notice of Unacceptability for impoundments previously found acceptable. Also outlines appeal procedures. |